rayyan syed
rayyan syed 14 jam yang lalu
Anyone here getting accession vibes
Uber Menschen
Uber Menschen 14 jam yang lalu
Having stick time is important. That’s the reason we have flight simulator and real stick time instead of 100% reliance on auto pilot and ILS.
Donald Scott
Donald Scott 14 jam yang lalu
Awesome video
The Goldey Family
The Goldey Family 14 jam yang lalu
Is it funny how they just "lost" the technology to go to the moon??
Nugget Azzerz
Nugget Azzerz 14 jam yang lalu
Yes sir
Robin Collins
Robin Collins 14 jam yang lalu
The waiting passive proportionately reduce because tire medicinally concern circa a smiling thistle. shaky, languid toenail
dorbie 14 jam yang lalu
They can simulate a lunar lander system now for training, the computer systems and rendering is up to the task That wasn't the case in the 60s.
Richard R
Richard R 14 jam yang lalu
It's a giant nut cracker, Right???
Brent Boswell
Brent Boswell 14 jam yang lalu
So when will this canon be throwing the opening pitch? 😁
Nellik 14 jam yang lalu
With the pace SpaceX is developing Starship, pretty soon NASA will just have a test centre on the moon!!
Veasna Samreth
Veasna Samreth 14 jam yang lalu
The omniscient stick observationally flow because pepper modestly smash qua a magical budget. fantastic, simple doubt
Esat'ın Maceraları
Esat'ın Maceraları 14 jam yang lalu
backup is always good
Leo Ponce
Leo Ponce 14 jam yang lalu
16:47 .. that beat tho
Mr. Coffee
Mr. Coffee 14 jam yang lalu
16:46 who knew lunar lander test vehicles could beatbox XD
Daniel Bavisetti
Daniel Bavisetti 14 jam yang lalu
Hello 👋 Everyone I am from the future.
Thomas McElroy
Thomas McElroy 14 jam yang lalu
software with manual override should definitely be the go to. No reason not to make it easier with software, and no reason to not to have an expert ready in case it goes wrong. Redundancy is absolutely worth it when the cost per attempt is so high.
goat325 14 jam yang lalu
landing something on the moon with people in it is maybe the ultimate "trust, but verify" situation
cbryantbear 14 jam yang lalu
“Chug-a chug-a chug-a choo choo!”
AJ Rupert
AJ Rupert 14 jam yang lalu
What about allowing the human to flying as if they are in earth's gravity, and simply having the software translate that to moon gravity controls?
Center 4 Nerds
Center 4 Nerds 14 jam yang lalu
I think we need both. Use software, but have human for backup. Software can bug out in ways we have no way to predict where humans can adapt in real time with training in ways software can't yet
E rrupt Clayton
E rrupt Clayton 14 jam yang lalu
!t52222111111111111111‰%-+*/45-&&[email protected]&3#$3&$&2$#&43(5:,75*6***44&##$)++=$344&$=((
GildedBear 14 jam yang lalu
I'm with you Destin. While automated landing systems are nice, we also need to train the people because if the automated system fails at just the wrong time the humans inside NEED to be able to take over. Otherwise the moon may become their resting place.
GateGeek 14 jam yang lalu
16:45 That lander is about to drop the sickest new album of 2013
Saghetti 14 jam yang lalu
1:43 Among Us?!?!?!?! 😳
Sam Bradshaw
Sam Bradshaw 14 jam yang lalu
I want the next sub video !!!
Sean G
Sean G 14 jam yang lalu
That was a sick beat that thing was putting out... I was so waiting for that beat to drop
David Messer
David Messer 14 jam yang lalu
I wonder how that thing could see the ground through the exhaust.
N A 14 jam yang lalu
This video follows my line of thought right up until you don't figure out the max speed at which a glove can catch a ball.
William Hitchcock
William Hitchcock 14 jam yang lalu
I'll just drop the thumbs up before the ad is even done just in case I forget to hit it after.
Steve White
Steve White 14 jam yang lalu
Destin, new camera in the office? Looks different
Edgar Fagundes
Edgar Fagundes 14 jam yang lalu
14 bis .... Santos Dumont first world !!
The Chemical Workshop
The Chemical Workshop 14 jam yang lalu
90% hydrogen peroxide is pretty dangerous btw... but not as horrible as some other things
Benjamin Forman
Benjamin Forman 14 jam yang lalu
When Destin's talking about Software vs Human landing, it reminds me of my childhood reading Robert Heinlein scifi novels. I remember many times where a character was hunched over a button or yoke or lever, sweating bullets and years of life as the automated system performed a task, and they had to determine in a split second whether it had botched the job. Man, that took me back!😅
[DarkmindGames] SLIVER
[DarkmindGames] SLIVER 14 jam yang lalu
I only have one question: how did you get clearance to climb aboard a nuclear submarine as a civilian? Lol.
Safwan Fathi
Safwan Fathi 15 jam yang lalu
"It was fun :)" - logan 2021
Killian Preston
Killian Preston 15 jam yang lalu
Linus: Gives Destin a storage system. Destin: Still uses eHDDs.
Joe 14 jam yang lalu
The drive was from 2013 it seems like. So has just been sitting in whatever long term storage he had at the time. No harm in it sitting there not spinning or being accessed. However, should probably get it on storage that's being backed up so there are multiple copies.
Ho Fadry
Ho Fadry 15 jam yang lalu
If the EGC thruster does not thrust vector how does the lander simulate the angle required to simulate landing on the moon? l love your videos. Thanks for making them.
Killian Preston
Killian Preston 15 jam yang lalu
Why didn't Destin put the footage in his NAS that Linus gave him?
Dwayne Madsen
Dwayne Madsen 15 jam yang lalu
Hydrogen peroxide is deadly stuff! I was at a cafe near Red Stone with a buddy. Waiter asked what I'd have? I thought it would be cool, so I said, "I'll have H2O!" My buddy laughed and said, "I'll have H2O, too!" I really miss that guy!
Hdresdendoc 15 jam yang lalu
i want the descent thrusters to be referred to as bangbangs from now on
Mikey G
Mikey G 15 jam yang lalu
I think it might be like a coupled ILS with the pilot clicking off the autopilot in the last 50 feet
Matt Robertson
Matt Robertson 15 jam yang lalu
Commence dorito consumption
Nick Combs
Nick Combs 15 jam yang lalu
Hey Destin, I agree that we should have a trained human pilot, but only as the last resort. If we're looking for redundancy when piloting a lander, it comes down to how many disparate approaches we can apply. I'm assuming they've currently got hardcoded algorithms with some adjustable parameters. That's one option, and the human is another, but I think we should have at least one more in the form of an AI. What we're seeing is that machine learning is an incredible tool for interpreting a complex set of data and deriving the correct result. Unlike the human, the AI doesn't bring any Earth-gravity preconceptions, and it doesn't need to be painstakingly written. Instead, it just tries all the different approaches to evolve towards the solutions. Take it a step further and develop a GAN where it tries to land safely while an opposing AI tries to develop a landscape that is impossible to land on. Then both AI will become incredibly robust in a short amount of time. The opposing AI could also be helpful for human pilots' training. I think that would be the perfect plan B if/when the wrote algorithms fail, or if the pilot is unable to perform. It also means we have a highly adaptive tool that is generalized to conditions we wouldn't expect on just the moon. It could apply to many different missions. I can imagine if we're trying to eventually get lots of people to space, needing lots of highly trained pilots is going to become a limiting factor.
RandomTorok 15 jam yang lalu
As a computer scientist I know how often computers glitch. As a licensed pilot I would not fly a craft that doesn't let me take control. I will never ride in an autonomous vehicle unless there is some way to take over the controls.
David Aspinall
David Aspinall 15 jam yang lalu
Are these government sponsored videos?
State of Missouri
State of Missouri 15 jam yang lalu
1:28 "Thats what my buddy Logan did . . . He works at NASA" he says that so nonchalantly
Only Jesus Can Save Us
Only Jesus Can Save Us 15 jam yang lalu
John 3:16-17 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. Romans 6:23 23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Romans 10:9-10 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Amen!
Andrew Chandra
Andrew Chandra 15 jam yang lalu
Rick rolling Nassa's applications
David Vogel
David Vogel 15 jam yang lalu
I think for any new technology like a lunar lander, it is critically important to build replicas that humans can control for training. If we ever get to a point where we go to the moon enough that we gain a full understanding of it, then build full simulators that will suffice. But for now I think building replicas are super important.
Matthew Piper
Matthew Piper 15 jam yang lalu
And didn't explode.
Kyle Moore
Kyle Moore 15 jam yang lalu
I think it would be way cooler and the pilots involved would all say we should land with humans, however, as SpaceX and others are showing, software is quite reliable now when you have good hardware around it, so it’s likely to be safer when you remove an extra set of human error variables. That said, it may be worth it to have a human land it, regardless, just to say we did it... I mean, a human would still be responsible for writing the code and all of that and therefor for landing it, it’s just way cooler to have a human at the sticks, and may be way more meaningful. As long as we get there, get it done, and get it done safely though, it may not matter exactly how we did it in the long run. That said, obviously there maybe should be a human pilot override if the software goes haywire... rather than just aborting at that point which would likely be the case if the lander is automated. Obviously, there are still software mistakes because humans program them, but you can iron out those things with software automated test flights, but things like Boeing having set their clocks wrong on their docking capsule show that maybe there should in fact be a human override, unless we think aborting once we get to the moon is an acceptable outcome, rather than having another shot if the software glitches out or crashes or has a programming error... which unfortunately I think may be the likely scenario in the unlikely event that we do have a software malfunction on landing phase.
WXMAN66 15 jam yang lalu
Human in the loop is ideal. Electronics fail.
Gene Allen
Gene Allen 15 jam yang lalu
A good example of how the future of space will be accelerated forward by people like Elon Musk and SpaceX. They would have done this test in a couple of months in the SpaceX back yard like Boca Chica without 100 people and a nuclear style countdown and moved on to the next problem. NASA probably spent years and years and many tens of millions of dollars, plus, as was pointed out, there were multiple overlapping multi-million dollar NASA projects doing the same research. Sadly, today, NASA by itself couldn't move fast enough to get to the moon again before 2050!
DrAlexMore 15 jam yang lalu
Thank you for yet another amazing video ! Maybe it could be a middle ground, like new dji fpv drone. Pilot could abort landing spot choice by an algorithm and just point at where she wants to land. Then another algo just executes
Joseph Boyd
Joseph Boyd 15 jam yang lalu
Love that you got the Browns stadium in there, Cleveland Ohio!!
Cre8tvMG 15 jam yang lalu
16:46 - if DaftPunk gets ahold of that you'll get a million in royalties!
Kevin Reed
Kevin Reed 15 jam yang lalu
I think lessons learned from flight school should apply for this landing. Planes have auto-pilots but they do not eliminate the human element even with these advanced systems. There is an important reason for that Like with one of the mars landers. A difference in freedom units and matric units caused it to crash. If a human was on board they could of said this doesn't feel right I'm aborting or taking control. With out joy-stick training the humans will be doomed if 1 calculation is off by a degree. With so much riding on this, not having that back-up for your back-up could be disastrous.
Jimmy Bond
Jimmy Bond 15 jam yang lalu
@ 6:46 But there comes a point where they break away also. It might be when they get too close to each other. One bird will break off and a group of others will follow.
Mark Doan
Mark Doan 15 jam yang lalu
You must have run through the various thrusters role about five times ... makes for a longer video i suppose
kylerobertm 15 jam yang lalu
Hey Destin! Unrelated question but are you still actively researching the characteristics of a cracking whip? The question popped into my head when you showed us that sneak peek at the end of the video.
Brian Furber
Brian Furber 15 jam yang lalu
Look at a video working on flight control. I finally recognized someone on the video and I didn't realize that Mike H. works in controls (he coached my son in soccer). Being a Chemical/Control Engineer, I think the control loops from sensor to thruster is a fascinating subject.
swirlingbrain 15 jam yang lalu
That's what AI is good for.
Demetrio Montoya
Demetrio Montoya 15 jam yang lalu
You may only speak while holding the little plastic lunar lander module. Those are the rules.
andrew nelson
andrew nelson 15 jam yang lalu
LLTV idea, a giant quadcopter with a pilot module in the middle. The module would be gimbaled to accurately rotate to the equivalent angle experienced on the moon.
LieutenantNuggets 15 jam yang lalu
I can't believe you've had this footage for years. It must've been so tempting to upload it in the past
3Rton 15 jam yang lalu
Haven't we pretty much let go of human controls/intervention for launches, though? I feel like landing is probably eventually going to be machine only too (though be it next 10 years or 100 who knows)
Anselm Wiercioch
Anselm Wiercioch 15 jam yang lalu
Hoping to see Astrobotic feature in this lunar landing series!
Thomas Johnson
Thomas Johnson 15 jam yang lalu
we going to the moon again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Max Byrd’s Marvelous Musical Museum
Max Byrd’s Marvelous Musical Museum 15 jam yang lalu
Ofc I think they should implement both flight control software and human training. However, I’m not confident that humans would be better at solving flight control problems faster than a computer or back up computer could. With proper training I think being able to take manual control is great, however, I’m still very unconvinced that there wouldn’t be even more problems created by manual control. It really depends on what the actual lunar module would be like.
John Abbott
John Abbott 15 jam yang lalu
Thanks, Destin, for bringing us the kind of science that leaves me in awe, and makes me proud, at the same time.
FormulaZR 15 jam yang lalu
Better beat than anything that has won a grammy in the last 4 years at 16:47
Dale St. Louis
Dale St. Louis 15 jam yang lalu
Nope. We don't need a stinking emotional chaos-ape overriding the automated symptoms. If we have an emergency that the system can't handle, fine, for now, let the human steer, but that's not an emergency, it's a failed design. We need better and better (and always more better) automated systems to override / anticipate / prevent every problem, including human mistakes. Robotic cars are still in their infancy and they are orders of magnitude safer than humans. AND they don't get tired, distracted, angry, inpatient, or drunk. Space travel is infinitely harder than ground travel, and it needs every advantage.
julia Ruva
julia Ruva 15 jam yang lalu
The beard/mustache looks great.
MitchHappens 15 jam yang lalu
like a tesla there should still be some at the wheel/ controls that knows how to operate the vehicle in case something goes wrong.
Antoine Letarte
Antoine Letarte 15 jam yang lalu
What happens with the gravity cancellation thruster if the vehicle pitches? Wouldn’t it be no longer aligned with gravity? Wouldn’t that create a problem?
John Roby
John Roby 14 jam yang lalu
Good question. Unless it could be gimbaled, which I don't think they talked about.
Odd 15 jam yang lalu
16:45 This new Front Line Assembly track is fire.
Sinfulxhope 15 jam yang lalu
come to X
Benjamin Forman
Benjamin Forman 15 jam yang lalu
Man oh man, this is cool! Man oh man I'm enjoying this video! I'm actually understanding what the heck they're saying, and man oh man, I think this is super cool! This is me (a natural PottyMouth) being very respectful to Destin and the audience😅, but, MAN OH MAN, I'm loving this! After watching Perseverance's landing, this is just what I needed to keep that hype going in my soul! Almost like that School Pride assembly in high school after you win the Division Championship.😄
Parker Brown
Parker Brown 15 jam yang lalu
16:47 is the intro to some kind of dubstep/EDM track
Brennan G
Brennan G 15 jam yang lalu
But can it run FalcoX ;)